THE PALGRAVE HANBOOK OF METHODOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALSIM (Two Volumes)
(co-edited with Nathalie Bulle, CNRS/Sorbonne University)
THE MYSTERY OF RATIONALITY
MIND, BELIEFS AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
(co-edited with Gérald Bronner, Sorbonne Paris-4 University and French Academy of Technologies)
Joseph Agassi (Tel Aviv University and York University), Peter Boettke (George Mason University), Alban Bouvier (Institut Jean Nicod, ENS), Enzo Di Nuoscio (UniMol), Paul Dumouchel (Ritsumeikan University), Shaun Gallagher (University of Memphis), Herbert Gintis (Santa Fe Institute), Ian Jarvie (York University), Roger Frantz (San Diego University), Daniel Little (University of Michigan-Dearborn), Pierre Livet (Aix-Marseille University), Leslie Marsh (University of British Columbia), Karl-Dieter Opp (Leipzig University and and University of Washington), Emmanuel Picavet (Sorbonne Paris 1 University)
Analysis of the concept of rationality is a leitmotiv in the history of the social sciences and has involved endless disputes. Since it is difficult to give a precise definition of this concept, and there is a lack of agreement about its meaning, it is possible to say that there is a ‘mystery of rationality’. What is it to be rational? Is rationality merely instrumental or does it also involve the endorsement of values, i.e. the choice of goals? Should we consider rationality to be a normative principle or a descriptive one? Can rationality be only Cartesian or can it also be argumentative? Is rationality a conscious skill or a partly tacit one? This book, which has been written by an outstanding collection of authors, including both philosophers and social scientists, tries to make a useful contribution to the debates on these problems and shed some light on the mystery of rationality.
Nathalie Bulle, « Gérald BRONNER et Francesco DI IORIO (ed.), The Mystery of Rationality: Mind, Beliefs and the Social Sciences », Revue européenne des sciences sociales [En ligne], mis en ligne le 13 février 2020, consulté le 06 avril 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ress/6086
COGNITIVE AUTONOMY AND METHODOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALISM
THE INTERPRETATIVE FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIAL LIFE
My book is also available as a Springer MyCopy version, which is a service that
allows library patrons to order a personal, printed-on-demand softcover edition of an
eBook for just $/€24.99.
Unlike psychologistic paradigms, the non-atomistic variant of methodological individualism discussed in this book explains society in terms of complex emergent structures that unintentionally result from human actions, and that in turn influence those actions. Friedrich Hayek is an emblematic representative of this approach, the origins of which date back to the Scottish Enlightenment. One of Hayek’s most original – but also less well-known – contributions is his linking of this non–atomistic methodological individualism to a cognitive psychology centered on the idea that mind is both an interpretative device and a self-organizing system. This book uses Hayek’s reflections on mind as a starting point to investigate the concept of action from the standpoint of non-atomistic methodological individualism, and it explores the connections between Hayek’s cognitive psychology and approaches employed in various fields, such as phenomenology, hermeneutics, enactivism, neo-Weberian sociology and fallibilism. Focusing on the interpretative foundations of social life, the book conceives action as a product of the human mind’s cognitive autonomy, i.e. of its hermeneutic skills that are influenced by historical and socio-cultural factors.
“Di Iorio offers a new approach to Hayek’s Sensory Order, linking neuroscience to the old Verstehen tradition and to contemporary theories of self-organizing systems; this should be on the reading list of everyone who is interested in Hayek’s thought.”
Barry Smith, University at Buffalo, editor of The Monist
“This impressive and well-researched book breaks new ground in our understanding of F.A. Hayek and of methodological individualism more generally. It shows that methodological individualism sanctions neither an atomistic view of society nor a mechanical determinism. The book carefully analyzes an important tradition in the social sciences, and compares it to many important philosophical, sociological and economic systems of thought. This is an enlightening book for all scholars interested in the methodological problems of the social sciences.”
Mario J. Rizzo, New York University
“One of Hayek’s most important contributions is his linking of complex methodological individualism, which deals with the emergence of spontaneous orders and unintended collective structures in complex self-organizing social systems, with a cognitive psychology. What makes Francesco Di Iorio’s book of great interest is that, by building on Hayek’s seminal book The Sensory Order, it deepens the connections between cognition and rules of just conduct, taking into account relevant theories on subjectivity and consciousness such as phenomenology, hermeneutics and enactivism.”
Jean Petitot, École des hautes études en sciences sociales – EHESS, Paris
“In this thoughtful and enlightening book Francesco Di Iorio uses Hayek’s cognitive psychology as the starting point for investigation of the relationship between the autonomy of the agent and socio-cultural influences within methodological individualism. The book provides an illuminating and innovative analysis of a central issue in the philosophy of social science by setting Hayek’s view on mind and action in fruitful relation to approaches such as Gadamer’s hermeneutics, Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, Varela’s and Maturana’s enaction, Boudon’s interpretative sociology, Popper’s fallibilism and Mises’ praxeology. One of the most interesting aspects of this book is its argument that hermeneutics and fallibilism refer, not to two different methods but to the same one.”
Dario Antiseri, Emeritus Professor at LUISS University, Rome
“Francesco Di Iorio’s book explores, in an original way, the connections between Hayek’s methodological individualism and his fascinating idea that human mind is both an interpretative device and a self-organizing system. It is a brilliant, clearly written work, characterized by a certain intellectual courage, which makes a remarkable contribution to the sociology of knowledge.”
Gérald Bronner, Sorbonne Paris-4 University and French Academy of Technologies
Johanna Hochloff (2015). Cognitive Autonomy and Methodological Individualism. The Interpretative Foundations of Social Life. Anmerkungen zum gleichnamigen Buch von Francesco di Iorio. In ORDO – Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Bd 66: pp. 376-8.
Gabriele Ciampini (2018) Cognitive Autonomy and Methodological Individualism: The Interpretative Foundations of Social Life by Francesco Di Iorio. In Cosmos + Taxis. Studies in Emergent Order and Organization, vol. 5, issues 3-4, pp. 104-107.
Agency and Social Dynamics: Essays in the Philosophy of Economics and the Social Sciences
(co-edited with Hu Jun, Nankai University)
Nankai University Press
Bruce Caldwell (Duke University), Chor-yung Cheung (City University of Hong Kong), Paul Dumouchel (Ritsumeikan University), Daniel Little (University of Michigan-Dearborn), Uskali Maki (University of Helsinki), Jean Petitot (Ecole des hautes études en Sciences Sociales), Barry Smith (The State University of New York at Buffalo), Stephen Turner (University of South Florida), Jia Xiantong (Nankai University)
This book includes the Chinese translation of papers presented by the contributors at two scientific meetings I organized at Nankai University’s Department of Philosophy (the 2017 Workshop on the Philosophy of Economics and the Social Sciences and the 2019 Asian Conference on the Philosophy of the Social Sciences).
World 3 and Methodological Individualism in Popper’s Thought
Amazon kindle book published by the Japan Popper Society
Popper’s theory of World 3 is often regarded as incongruent with his defense of methodological individualism. This book criticizes this widespread view. Methodological individualism is said to be at odds with three crucial assumptions of the theory of World 3: (a) the impossibility of reducing World 3 to subjective mental states because it exists objectively, (b) the view that the mental functions cannot be explained by assuming that individuals are isolated atoms, and (c) the idea that World 3 has causal power and influences both individual minds and actions. This book demonstrates that the inconsistency thesis stems from a confusion between methodological individualism as understood by Popper and reductionism. The reasons for this confusion are analyzed and clarified. It is argued that two variants of methodological individualism can be distinguished, and that unlike psychologistic individualism, Popper’s nonatomistic individualism is fully consistent with his theory of World 3.